<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD projects 16 core proccessor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://omneity.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/amd-projects-16-core-proccessor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://omneity.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/amd-projects-16-core-proccessor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://omneity.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/amd-projects-16-core-proccessor/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omneity.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-308</guid>
		<description>This processor would be good for a program I use at school. CATIA is a 3D designing program we use to design parts for pretty much anything, and rendering an image of your product uses ALL of your CPU&#039;s Cores at 100%, if 16 cores, even if they ae only 1 GHz, were used for a render will produce a the render in a few minutes rather than a few hours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This processor would be good for a program I use at school. CATIA is a 3D designing program we use to design parts for pretty much anything, and rendering an image of your product uses ALL of your CPU&#8217;s Cores at 100%, if 16 cores, even if they ae only 1 GHz, were used for a render will produce a the render in a few minutes rather than a few hours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://omneity.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/amd-projects-16-core-proccessor/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omneity.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-217</guid>
		<description>It will own in games if its true that amd has found away to make multiple cores focus on a single thread. Think about it if most of the hype around this chip is true then amd is going to shake the cpu world up. Everyone was so sure amd would never catch nvidia but look at them now nvidia got hit up side the head with radeon 9870 x2  and they are still in shock in fact the fastest nvidia card is almost 30% slower than the 9870 x2. All i have to say is intel better watch out or they going to catch a strong right hook across the jaw just like nvidia did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will own in games if its true that amd has found away to make multiple cores focus on a single thread. Think about it if most of the hype around this chip is true then amd is going to shake the cpu world up. Everyone was so sure amd would never catch nvidia but look at them now nvidia got hit up side the head with radeon 9870 x2  and they are still in shock in fact the fastest nvidia card is almost 30% slower than the 9870 x2. All i have to say is intel better watch out or they going to catch a strong right hook across the jaw just like nvidia did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NICK</title>
		<link>http://omneity.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/amd-projects-16-core-proccessor/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>NICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omneity.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-120</guid>
		<description>are you for real? 16 core would mean almost close to reality games..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you for real? 16 core would mean almost close to reality games..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
